Understanding Green Buying Intention: The interplay of Cosmopolitanism, Ethnocentrism, Materialism, and Environmental Ethics

Dr Belinda Senooane*
Department of Marketing and Retail Management
University of South Africa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-8522
esenoobc@unisa.ac.za

Professor J. A. Wiid
Department of Marketing and Retail Management
University of South Africa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-532X

Professor N. Dilotsotlhe
Department of Marketing and Retail Management
University of South Africa
https://orcid.org/000-0002-9884-8522

Vol 21 | Issue 1 | 31-47

*Corresponding author

Abstract

Consumer concerns about the natural environment have increased tremendously due to rising environmental challenges. However, globalisation – with its increase in the production and consumption of commodities – has increased participation in global consumer culture, adversely affecting the environment. Consequently, research on the consumption–sustainability nexus has grown exponentially in an effort to understand how individuals can consume responsibly in a resource-constrained world. In light of these sustainability concerns, this study empirically investigated how cultural identity factors, such as cosmopolitanism, ethnocentrism and materialism, influence environmental ethics and predict green purchase intention. Using a survey-based approach, they proposed a model validated with data from 548 respondents using structural equation modelling. Results indicated that all hree variables had a significant positive effect on environmental ethics, although the effect of ethnocentrism was negligible. Unexpectedly, materialism also had a significant impact on environmental ethics. The results also revealed that environmental ethics strongly predicts green purchase behaviour, while also mediating the relationship between cultural identity factors and green purchase intention. These findings suggest that appealing to people’s cosmopolitan and material values and enhancing their environmental ethics may increase their participation in green consumption. The study provides implications for practice and suggestions for further research.


Keywords:
cosmopolitanism, ethnocentrism, materialism and environmental ethics, green buying intention

Back to Volume 21 | Issue 1 | June 2025


DOI

References

Afzal, F, Shao, Y, Sajid, M & Afzal, F. 2019. Market Sustainability: A Globalization and Consumer Culture Perspective in the Chinese Retail Market. Sustainability. 11(3):575. doi.org/10.3390/su11030575.

Alam, MN, Ogiemwonyi, O, Hago, IbrahimE, Azizan, NA, Hashim, F & Hossain, MS. 2023. Understanding Consumer Environmental Ethics and the Willingness to Use Green Products. SAGE Open. 13(1):21582440221149727. doi.org/10.1177/21582440221149727.

Awad, A & Saadaoui Mallek, R. 2023. Globalisation’s impact on the environment’s quality: Does the proliferation of information and communication technologies services matter? An empirical exploration. Environmental Development. 45:100806. doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100806.

Badar, K, Khattak, A, Danish, M, Tariq, A & Nisar, QA. 2025. Cosmopolitan orientation, consumer consciousness and green purchase intentions: mediating role of green trust. European J. of International Management. 25(1):79–97. doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2025.143271.

Bak, H-J. 2018. Thinking Globally and Acting Locally?: Geographical Dimension of Environmental Concern as Predictors of Pro-environmental Behaviors. Development and Society. 47(4):587–612.

Baumgartner, H & Weijters, B. 2022. Structural Equation Modeling. In: Handbook of Market Research. C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 549–586. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_14.

Bevan-Dye, AL. 2021. South African Generation Y students’ global consumer orientation. Journal of Contemporary Management. 18(2):140–161. doi.org/10.35683/jcm21093.124.

Borowiec, J & Papież, M. 2024. Convergence of CO2 emissions in countries at different stages of development. Do globalisation and environmental policies matter? Energy Policy. 184:113866. doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113866.

Casalegno, C, Candelo, E & Santoro, G. 2022. Exploring the antecedents of green and sustainable purchase behaviour: A comparison among different generations. Psychology & Marketing. 39(5):1007–1021. doi.org/10.1002/mar.21637.

Chaturvedi, P, Agnihotri, D & Tripathi, V. 2023. Exploring the role of consumer ethnocentrism in predicting the purchase intention for locally produced organic food in an emerging market. British Food Journal. 126(2):738–757. doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2023-0323.

Cheung, GW, Cooper-Thomas, HD, Lau, RS & Wang, LC. 2024. Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 41(2):745–783. doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y.

Chiang, M-C, Yen, C & Chen, H-L. 2022. Does Age Matter? Using Neuroscience Approaches to Understand Consumers’ Behavior towards Purchasing the Sustainable Product Online. Sustainability. 14(18):11352. doi.org/10.3390/su141811352.

Cleveland, M & Laroche, M. 2007. Acculturaton to the global consumer culture: Scale development and research paradigm. Journal of Business Research. 60(3):249–259. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.11.006.

Cleveland, M, Papadopoulos, N & Laroche, M. 2021. Global consumer culture and national identity as drivers of materialism: an international study of convergence and divergence. International Marketing Review. 39(2):207–241. doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2021-0097.

Das, M & Mukherjee, D. 2019. Cosmopolitanism, Materialism, Consumer Ethnocentrism and Consumer Behaviour: Evidence from Aboriginal Tripuri Tribe of India. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review. 8(2):104–119. doi.org/10.1177/2277975218809207.

Fornell, C & Larcker, D, F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error – Claes Fornell, David F. Larcker, 1981. Journal of Marketing Research. 18(1):39–50. doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

Furukawa, H & Lee, K-T. 2023. Environmentally Friendly Materialism: How It Is Generated and How Luxury Apparel Addresses Environmental Problems. Sustainability. 15(8):6703. doi.org/10.3390/su15086703.

Gil, MS, Su, J, Watchravesringkan, K & Taras, V. 2024. Do cosmopolitans care about the world? The effect of cosmopolitanism on the consumption ofsustainable apparel. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. 28(3):480–501. doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2022-0143.

Gonzalez-Fuentes, M. 2019. Millennials’ national and global identities as drivers of materialism and consumer ethnocentrism. The Journal of Social Psychology. 159(2):170–189. doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1570904.

Haba, HF, Bredillet, C & Dastane, O. 2023. Green consumer research: Trends and way forward based on bibliometric analysis. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption. 8:100089. doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100089.

Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ & Anderson, RE. 2018. Multivariate data analysis. 8th ed. Mason: Cengage.

Henseler, J, Ringle, CM & Sarstedt, M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 43(1):115–135. doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

Ito, K, Leung, AK -y. & Huang, T. 2020. Why do cosmopolitan individuals tend to be more pro-environmentally committed? The mediating pathways via knowledge acquisition and emotional affinity toward nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 68:101395. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101395.

Jiang, W, Liu, H & Jiang, J. 2021. The Development of Materialism in Emerging Adulthood: Stability, Change, and Antecedents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 47(2):293–306. doi.org/10.1177/0146167220925234.

Kamwendo, A, Corbishley, K & Mason, R. 2014. South African consumer ethnocentrism and attitudes towards foreign convenience products. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 12(4):320–333.

Khare, A & Kautish, P. 2020. Cosmopolitanism, self-identity, online communities and green apparel perception. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 39(1):91–108. doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2019-0556.

Kim, JH. 2019. Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 72(6):558–569. doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087.

Kinawy, RN. 2025. Unraveling consumer behavior: Exploring the influence of consumer ethnocentrism, domestic country bias, brand trust, and purchasing intentions. Strategic Change. 34(2):137–150. doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2607.

Kock, F, Berbekova, A & Assaf, AG. 2021. Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management. 86:104330. doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330.

Kour, M. 2024. Understanding the drivers of green consumption: a study on consumer behavior, environmental ethics, and sustainable choices for achieving SDG 12. SN Business & Economics. 4(9):97. doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00691-w.

Leung, AK -y. & Koh, B. 2019. Understanding pro-environmental intentions by integrating insights from social mobility, cosmopolitanism, and social dominance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 22(2):213–222. doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12348.

Leung, AK -y., Kho, K & Tam, K-P. 2015. Being environmentally responsible: Cosmopolitan orientation predicts pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 43:79–94. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.011.

Maduku, DK, Rana, NP, Mpinganjira, M & Thusi, P. 2025. Exploring the ‘Dark Side’ of AI-Powered Digital Assistants: A Moderated Mediation Model of Antecedents and Outcomes of Perceived Creepiness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. n/a(n/a):1–28. doi.org/10.1002/cb.2462.

Mai, NTT. 2019. An investigation into the relationship between materialism and green purchase behavior in Vietnam and Taiwan. Journal of Economics and Development. 21(2):247–258. doi.org/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0044.

Mariyono, D, Kamila, ANA & Hidayatullah, ANA. 2025. Unity in diversity: navigating global connections through cultural exchange. Quality Education for All. 2(1):114–137. doi.org/10.1108/QEA-10-2024-0122.

Markauskaitė, R & Rūtelionė, A. 2022. Causes of Consumer Materialistic and Green Value Conflict: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 14(5021):1–18. doi.org/10.3390/su14095021.

Martin, C, Czellar, S & Pandelaere, M. 2019. Age-related changes in materialism in adults – A self-uncertainty perspective. Journal of Research in Personality. 78:16–24. doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.09.007.

Mishra, U & Mishra, U. 2025. Consumer Ethnocentrism and Green Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Pro-Environmental Attitude in Nepal’s Sustainable Consumption. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences. 15(1):117–134. doi.org/10.56536/ijmres.v15i1.753.

Munaro, AC, Barcelos, RH & Maffezzolli, ECF. 2024. The impact of influencers on sustainable consumption: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 52:401–415. doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.024.

Ogiemwonyi, O & Jan, MT. 2023. The correlative influence of consumer ethical beliefs, environmental ethics, and moral obligation on green consumption behavior. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances. 19:200171. doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200171.

Ogiemwonyi, O, Alam, MN, Alshareef, R, Alsolamy, M, Azizan, NA & Mat, N. 2023. Environmental factors affecting green purchase behaviors of the consumers: Mediating role of environmental attitude. Cleaner Environmental Systems. 10:100130. doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100130.

Podsakoff, PM, Podsakoff, NP, Williams, LJ, Huang, C & Yang, J. 2024. Common Method Bias: It’s Bad, It’s Complex, It’s Widespread, and It’s Not Easy to Fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 11(Volume 11, 2024):17–61. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030.

Prince, M, Yaprak, AN & Palihawadana, D. 2019. The moral bases of consumer ethnocentrism and consumer cosmopolitanism as purchase dispositions. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 36(3):429–438. doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2017-2432.

Richins, ML. 2004. The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research. 31(1):209–219. doi.org/10.1086/383436.

Senooane, B, Wiid, JA & Dilotsotlhe, N. 2025. Acculturation to global consumer culture and environmentally ethical behaviour: the mediating role of environmental consciousness. Cogent Business & Management. 12(1):2472295. doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2472295.

Sharifonnasabi, Z, Bardhi, F & Luedicke, MK. 2020. How globalization affects consumers: Insights from 30 years of CCT globalization research. Marketing Theory. 20(3):273–298. doi.org/10.1177/1470593119887469.

Sobaih, AEE & Elshaer, IA. 2022. Personal Traits and Digital Entrepreneurship: A Mediation Model Using SmartPLS Data Analysis. Mathematics. 10(21):3926. doi.org/10.3390/math10213926.

Sreen, N, Purbey, S & Sadarangani, P. 2020. Understanding the Relationship Between Different Facets of Materialism and Attitude Toward Green Products. Journal of Global Marketing. 33(5):396–416. doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1751370.

Strizhakova, Y & Coulter, RA. 2013. The “green” side of materialism in emerging BRIC and developed markets: The moderating role of global cultural identity. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 30(1):69–82. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.08.003.

Strizhakova, Y & Coulter, RA. 2024. Environmental and Social Sustainability: A Consumer Cultural Identity Perspective in the Global-Local Marketplace. Journal of Sustainable Marketing. 5(1):43–49. doi.org/10.51300/JSM-2024-118.

Syed, S, Acquaye, A, Khalfan, MM, Obuobisa-Darko, T & Yamoah, FA. 2024. Decoding sustainable consumption behavior: A systematic review of theories and models and provision of a guidance framework. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances. 23:200232. doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2024.200232.

Thomas, F & Varghese, RM. 2022. Acculturation of Consumer Culture on Impulsive Buying Behaviour among Gen Y: A Contingent Role of Gender. Vision. (April, 17):09722629221091651. doi.org/10.1177/09722629221091651.

Wang, J & Huo, Y. 2022. Effect of Materialism on Pro-environmental Behavior Among Youth in China: The Role of Nature Connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794816.

Yu, T-Y, Yu, T-K & Chao, C-M. 2017. Understanding Taiwanese undergraduate students’ pro-environmental behavioral intention towards green products in the fight against climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production. 161:390–402. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.115.

Zeugner-Roth, KP, Žabkar, V & Diamantopoulos, A. 2015. Consumer Ethnocentrism, National Identity, and Consumer Cosmopolitanism as Drivers of Consumer Behavior: A Social Identity Theory Perspective. Journal of International Marketing. 23(2):25–54. doi.org/10.1509/jim.14.0038.

Zhang, L & Takahashi, Y. 2024. Both cosmopolitanism and ethnocentrism are positively associated with individual differences in global literacy. Personality and Individual Differences. 222:112585. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112585.

Zhang, L, Xu, M, Chen, H, Li, Y & Chen, S. 2022. Globalization, Green Economy and Environmental Challenges: State of the Art Review for Practical Implications. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 10. doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.870271.

Back to Volume 21 | Issue 1 | June 2025