Vol 21 | Issue 1 | 71-93
Norman Mafuratidze*
Department of Marketing
University of Johannesburg,
South Africa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8626-3738
nmafuratidze@uj.ac.za
Professor Marius Wait
Department of Marketing
University of Johannesburg,
South Africa
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-5956
mwait@uj.ac.za
Professor Ilse Struweg
Department of Marketing
University of Johannesburg,
South Africa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1448-5286
istruweg@uj.ac.za
*Corresponding author
Abstract
Purpose: This study uses the integrative literature review (ILR) methodology to examine the evolution of marketing definitions through technological transformation, demonstrating ILR’s unique capacity to synthesise diverse sources and reveal thematic developments in marketing’s progression.
Design/methodology/approach: The research implements a systematic five-step ILR process encompassing review design, establishing inclusion/exclusion criteria, comprehensive literature searches, data extraction, and critical synthesis to identify key patterns and shifts in marketing definitions over time.
Findings: The analysis reveals a progressive shift in marketing definitions from transactional approaches towards a value co-creation paradigm characterised by multiple interconnected actors operating in service ecosystems.
Originality: This study advances the qualitative methodological discourse by demonstrating ILR’s effectiveness in examining complex, evolving concepts, distinguishing itself from traditional systematic review approaches.
Research implications: The findings establish a foundation for the future application of the ILR methodology in emerging marketing domains, particularly in digital transformation and sustainability contexts.
Practical implications: The research provides scholars and practitioners with insights for aligning marketing strategies with contemporary demands through a comprehensive understanding of marketing’s definitional evolution.
Keywords: Integrative literature review, qualitative research, marketing, value exchange
References
Akaka, M. A., Koskela-Huotari, A., & Vargo, S. L. (2021). Formalising service‑dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward. AMS Review, 11(3), 375–389.
Allbritton, D., Gómez, P., Angele, B., Vasilev, M., & Perea, M. (2024). Breathing life into meta-analytic methods. Journal of Cognition, 7(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.389
Aom.org. (2025). Academy of Management Review. [online] Available at: https://journals.aom.org/journal/amr [Accessed 17 Feb. 2025].
Aveyard, H., Bradbury-Jones, C. An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis. BMC Med Res Methodol 19, 105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0751-7
Bae, J.-M. (2014). Narrative Reviews. Epidemiology and Health, 36. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014018
Barwell, C. (1965). The Marketing of Industrial Products (C. Wilson (ed.)).
Basu, N., Barinas, J., Williams, K., Clanton, C., & Smith, P. (2023). Understanding nurse suicide using an ideation-to-action framework: an integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(12), 4472-4488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15681
Booth, A. (2006). Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 355–368.
Boston University Medical Campus. (2011). “Inclusion/exclusion criteria adherence QC tool”. https://www.bumc.bu.edu/crro/files/2011/04/Self-assessment-incl-excl.doc
Brassington, F., & Pettitt, S. (2006). Principles of Marketing. London: Pearson Education.
Cooke, B., & Kumar, A. (2020). US philanthropy’s shaping of management education in the 20th century: toward a periodisation of history. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), 21–39.
Coombes, P. (2023). Systematic review research in marketing scholarship: optimising rigor. International Journal of Market Research, 6(6), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231184729
Crosno, J., Dahlstrom, R., Liu, Y., & Tong, P. Y. (2021). Effectiveness of contracts in marketing exchange relationships: A meta-analytic review. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 122–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.11.007
Cumming, M. M., Bettini, E. F., & Chow, J. C. (2023). High-quality systematic literature reviews in special education: promoting coherence, contextualisation, generativity, and transparency. Exceptional Children, 89, 412–431.
De la Rasilla, I. (2019). The problem of periodisation in the history of international law. Law and History Review, 37(1), 275–308.
De Souza, M. T., Da Silva, M. D., & De Carvalho, R. (2010). Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein (São Paulo), 8(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134
Dela, C., & Gross, J. (2017). An Integrative Literature Review Framework for Postgraduate Nursing Research Reviews. European Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(1), 7–15.
Doyle, P. (1976). Marketing Control and Pricing in Inflation. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:168438267
Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: a structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40, 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001
Elsbach, K. D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2020). Creating high‐impact literature reviews: an argument for ‘integrative reviews’. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1277–1289.
Fan, D., Breslin, D., Callahan, J. L., & Iszatt-White, M. (2022). Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291
Free Word Cloud Generator. (2025). Free Word Cloud Generator. [online] Available at: https://www.freewordcloudgenerator.com/ [Accessed 17 Feb. 2025].
Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J., & Ratten, V. (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103
Gamble, J., Gilmore, A., McCartan-Quinn, D., & Durkan, P. (2011). The Marketing concept in the 21st century: A review of how Marketing has been defined since the 1960s. The Marketing Review, 11. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934711X589444
Gamble, J., Gilmore, A., McCartan-Quinn, D., & Durkan, P. (2011). The marketing concept in the 21st century: a review of how marketing has been defined since the 1960s. The Marketing Review, 11(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934711X589444
Gentles, S., Charles, C., Nicholas, D., Ploeg, J., & McKibbon, K. (2016). Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research. Systematic Reviews, 5, 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0343-0
Gernsheimer, O., Kanbach, D. K., & Gast, J. (2021). Coopetition research—A systematic literature review on recent accomplishments and trajectories. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.05.001
Gonzalez, M. M. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative research: a review. The Qualitative Report, 21, 1546–1548.
Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Chiropr Med. 2006 Autumn;5(3):101-17. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6. PMID: 19674681; PMCID: PMC2647067.
Grönroos, C. (2009). Marketing as promise management: regaining customer management for marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620910966237
Gul, S., Shah, T. A., Ahmad, S., Gulzar, F., & Shabir, T. (2021). Is grey literature really grey or a hidden glory to showcase the sleeping beauty. Collection and Curation, 40(3):100–111.
Haavisto, S. (2021). Evolution of marketing thought and practice: history of the Finnish marketing industry 1883–2020 [Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University, Finland].
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Hughes, I. (2005). A perspective on perspectives. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90, 771. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.073536
Hulland, J., & Houston, M. B. (2020). Why systematic review papers and meta-analyses matter: an introduction to the special issue on generalisations in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 351–359.
Hunt, S. D. (2020). Indigenous theory development in marketing: the foundational premises approach. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00165-w
Hunt, S. D., Madhavaram, S., & Hatfield, H. N. (2022). The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: the manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal. AMS Review, 12(3–4), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-022-00238-y
Hyman, M. R., & Kostyk, A. (2022). “An aspirational definition of marketing: an abstract”, in Pantoja, F., Wu, S. (eds), From micro to macro: dealing with uncertainties in the global marketplace, AMSAC 2020: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science Annual Conference, pp. 261–262.
İzmir, O. (2021). “What is marketing and where does it progress? past, present and future directions”, International Congress on Business and Marketing, pp. 95–103.
Jones-Devitt, S., Austen, L., & Parkin, H. (2017). Integrative reviewing for exploring complex phenomena. Social Research Update, 66, 1–4.
Kotler, P. (2005). The role played by the broadening of marketing movement in the history of marketing thought. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24, 114–116.
Kotler, P. (2020). Marketing and value creation. Journal of Creating Value, 6(1), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964320903559
Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2004) Principles of Marketing. 10th Edition, Pearson-Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 10–15.
Krafft, M., Sajtos, L., & Haenlein, M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for marketing scholars in times of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 51, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.06.001
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1023–1042.
Kutcher, A. M., & LeBaron, V. T. (2022). A simple guide for completing an integrative review using an example article. Journal of Professional Nursing, 40(August 2021), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.02.004
Lallas, E. N., Santouridis, I., Mountzouris, G., Gerogiannis, V. C., & Karageorgos, A. (2022). An SQWRL-based method for assessing regulatory compliance in the pharmaceutical industry. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 10923. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110923
Lies, J. (2019). Marketing Intelligence and Big Data: Digital Marketing Techniques on their Way to Becoming Social Engineering Techniques in Marketing. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(5), 134. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2019.05.002
Lim, W. M. (2022). The art of writing for premier journals. Global Business and Organizational Excellence.
Linnenluecke, M., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
Liu, R. (2017). A reappraisal of marketing definition and theory. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v4i2.170
Lubbe, W., Ten Ham-Baloyi, W., & Smit, K. (2020). The integrative literature review as a research method: a demonstration review of research on neurodevelopmental supportive care in preterm infants. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 26(6), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2020.04.006
Madhavaram, S., & Hatfield, H. N. (2022). Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline. AMS Review, 12(3–4), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w
Madhavaram, S., & Hatfield, H. N. (2022). Continuing the manifesto conversation: toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline. AMS Review, 12(3–4), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w
Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. (2024). Guidelines for bibliometric‐systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381
Massaro, M., Dumay, J. and Guthrie, J. (2016) On the Shoulders of Giants: Undertaking a Structured Literature Review in Accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29, 767-801.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939
Mikkonen, K., & Kääriäinen, M. (2020). “Content analysis in systematic reviews”, in Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, K., & Kääriäinen, M. (Ed.s), The application of content analysis in nursing science research, Springer, Cham, 105–115.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (Ed.s), Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook 4th ed., Sage, pp. 62–99.
Minerbo, C., & Brito, L. A. L. (2021). An integrated perspective of value creation and capture: a systematic literature review. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(4), 768-789. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-12-2020-0542
Mir, F. A., Kausar, A. R., & Kitchlew, N. (2021). Resource integration process in complex service systems: examining value co-creation at higher education institutions. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(5), 863–877.
Morris, S. (2023). Meta-analysis in organisational research: a guide to methodological options. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031921-021922
Mulyanto, A., Hartati, S., & Wardoyo, R. (2022). “Systematic literature review of text feature extraction,” 2022 Seventh International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), pp. 1–6.
Nenonen, S. (2022). Resurrecting marketing: focus on the phenomena! AMS Review, 12(3), 174–176.
O’Kane, P., Ott, D., Smith, A., & Brown, T. (2022). Understanding Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software as a Tool to Enhance Systematic Literature Reviews in Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development Review, 22, 153448432211446. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221144668
Ocholla, D. N., & Ocholla, L. (2020). Readiness of academic libraries in South Africa to research, teaching and learning support in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Library Management, 41(6–7), 355–368.
Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC6020031
Olaitan, O. O., Issah, M., & Wayi, N. (2021). A framework to test South Africa’s readiness for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. SA Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1284
Pandey, G. (2024). Doing a literature review in English language teaching research: practical suggestions. Access: An International Journal of Nepal Library Association, 3(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.3126/access.v3i1.69429
Parvatiyar, A., & Sheth, J. N. (2021). Toward an integrative theory of marketing. AMS Review, 11, 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-021-00211-1
Paul, J., & Criado, A. (2020). The art of writing literature review: what do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
Pintas, J. T., Fernandes, L. A. F., & Garcia, A. C. (2021). Feature selection methods for text classification: a systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 6149–6200.
Rodrigues, A. I., Costa, A. P., & Moreira, A. C. (2019). “Using CAQDAS in visual data analysis: a systematic literature review”, in Rodrigues, A. I., Costa, A. P., & Moreira, A. C. (Ed.s), Computer Supported Qualitative Research, WCQR 2018, AISC, Springer, Cham, 861, pp. 235–247.
Rogers, K. (1963). Managers: Personality and performance. Managers: Personality and Performance, 1–184. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315013763/MANAGERS-KENN-ROGERS
Rosário, A. T., & Dias, J. C. (2022). Industry 4.0 and marketing: towards an integrated future research agenda. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 11(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan11030030
Russell, C. L. (2005). An overview of the integrative research review. Progress in Transplantation, 15(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/152692480501500102
Rutkowska, M., & Sulich, A. (2020). Green jobs on the background of Industry 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.132
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers 4th ed., SAGE. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=p6UIzgEACAAJ
Sato, M. (2015). “Time, chronology, and periodisation in history”, in Wright, J. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences 2nd ed., Elsevier, pp. 409–414. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868621487
Scagnoli, N. I., & Verdinelli, S. (2017). Editors’ perspective on the use of visual displays in qualitative studies. Qualitative Report, 22(7), 1945–1963. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2202
Sciencedirect.com. (2021). Journal of Business Research | THEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS, BIBLIOGRAPHIC, AND META-ANALYSES | ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier. [online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/special-issue/10RGT0TKJWJ [Accessed 17 Feb. 2025].
Senivongse, C., Bennet, A., & Mariano, S. (2017). Utilising a systematic literature review to develop an integrated framework for information and knowledge management systems. Vine Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-03-2017-0011
Sigauke, I., & Swansi, K. (2020). “Classic” grounded theory: an extraction of Saldana’s coding heuristics. International Forum Journal, 23(1), 5–23.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(July), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Soaita, A., Serin, B., & Preece, J. (2019). A methodological quest for systematic literature mapping. International Journal of Housing Policy, 20, 320–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2019.1649040.
Sushmita, S., Nikhil, P., & Drashti, S. (2023). Importance of Data Integrity in Pharmaceutical Industry. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, February, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra12492
Tadajewski, M. and Maclaran, P. (2008). Critical Marketing Studies: Introduction and Overview. [online] Available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/26437_Tadajewski_Volume_I_Introduction.pdf.
Takahashi, S., & Takahashi, V.P. (2022). Analysis of front end dynamic in the value co-creation with multiple stakeholders. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
Thilakaratne, M., Falkner, K., & Atapattu, T. (2019). A systematic review on literature-based discovery. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365756.
Toronto, C. E., & Remington, R. (Ed.s). (2020). A step-by-step guide to conducting an integrative review. Springer, Cham.
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative reviews of the literature. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 7(3), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijavet.2016070106
Van Ewijk, E., & Ros-Tonen, M. A. F. (2021). The fruits of knowledge co-creation in agriculture and food-related multi-stakeholder platforms in sub-Saharan Africa – a systematic literature review. Agricultural Systems, 186(September 2020), 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102949
Varadarajan, R. (2022). A general theory of marketing: conceivable, elusive, or illusive. AMS Review, 12, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-022-00246-y
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.
Vargo, S. L., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vink, J. (2020). “Service dominant logic: foundations and applications”, in Bridges, E., & Fowler, K. (Ed.s), The Routledge handbook of service research insights and ideas, Routledge, pp. 3–23.
Walker, L.O. and Avant, K.C. (2011). Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, New York.
Webster, F. (1992). The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600402
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Williams, R., Clark, L., Clark, W., & Raffo, D. (2020). Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Journal,39(4), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EMJ.2020.09.007
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
Zhang, T., Lu, C., Torres, E., & Cobanoglu, C. (2020). Value co-creation and technological progression: a critical review. European Business Review, 32(4), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-08-2019-0149
Zheng, Q., Chen, J., Zhang, R., & Wang, H. H. (2020). What factors affect Chinese consumers’ online grocery shopping? product attributes, e-vendor characteristics and consumer perceptions. China Agricultural Economic Review, 12(2), 193–213.